I recently read an article that dives into the murky question: does literature help us understand others? Have more empathy? The article begins hopefully with a quote from Joyce Carol Oates: “Reading is the sole means by which we slip, involuntarily, often helplessly, into another’s skin.”
This is a challenging question with important consequences. What do we demand from higher education? Is reading being pushed out of our visual, digital world?
The idea that literature orients readers to the thoughts and feelings of others is something we’ve lived with for a very long time. Psychologists are now trying to test it in the lab. I wasn’t totally surprised that they fall back on the “chicken or egg” position:
“A lifetime of reading might make people better at imagining other people’s thoughts and emotions, or those who are more in tune with other people’s states of minds might be drawn to reading fiction in the first place. Or, a completely unrelated variable might explain the correlation.”
My friends Carole and Camille, both lifelong readers, gave me a total thumbs up. “Yes, and studies prove it.” And, “yes, absolutely!”
Stuart is thoughtful: “I can have empathy even with characters that I don't like because I can sense the complexity of their motivations. I do think that it carries over to everyday life, though in subtle, subconscious ways.”
I liked Gerry’s response: “It depends on who is doing the reading.” With humility, he relies on himself for the empathy.
What do you think?
I agree with all of my friends. As for the tests, I don’t think that everything can be measured. I’m content with conjecture or hope.